Check coverage before comparing two weeks
This analysis shows why source coverage, publication dates, and indexing delays must be checked before a weekly increase is interpreted as growth.
Evidence-led comparisons of the observatory’s corpus, with scope and uncertainty made explicit.
This analysis shows why source coverage, publication dates, and indexing delays must be checked before a weekly increase is interpreted as growth.
The observatory keeps source records separate for provenance while grouping only explicitly connected publication versions for research counts.
Multi-label topic rules support discovery, but their totals cannot be added or interpreted as exclusive market shares.
Citation metadata can help readers orient themselves, but it cannot fairly rank new work or replace reading the evidence.